Reiseplan » e obviously has a duty to the team. But theyre still human

Welcome to the new and improved MLB Future Power Rankings! Weve decided to change our approach since the last time we updated these last November. We tweaked the categories and their weights in our total score for each team. We added a few relevant notes per team (such as best year to win a championship and worst contract). And we even changed the writer/ranker; master projector Dan Szymborski and his ZiPS system now provide the rank and snapshot of each franchise.So what are the Future Power Rankings? Simply put, theyre an attempt to measure how well each team is set up for sustained success over the next five years.We obviously cant project yet which team will be the best in baseball in 2030, but the near future is reaped from the seeds sowed in the present. Whats to come is always uncertain, but after a century and a half of organized professional baseball, we have a pretty good idea what factors commonly lead to future success. To get an estimated score for each team, we distilled the information available into four main categories:Current talent (25 percent of total score): This category focuses on the in-organization performance that teams are projected to have available from now until the end of the 2017 season. This is the easiest to gauge because of the shorter time horizon involved. A clubs 2016 performance may not necessarily be around in 2020, so current talent is not as heavily weighted as future talent, but players who contribute now can bring in future performance.Future talent (45 percent): This covers every bit of projected performance that teams have in their organization from 2018 onward, from veterans under contract to young major leaguers to this years draftees. With more uncertainty, computer projections are more fallible than in the near term; to take this into consideration, Ive also implemented Keith Laws farm system rankings.Financial support (20 percent): Poor teams -- or more accurately, less-rich teams -- can in fact compete, but it would be naive to pretend that its not trickier to keep a team like the Pittsburgh Pirates or Tampa Bay Rays in contention than the Los Angeles Dodgers. This category was developed with an index that includes historical team payrolls relative to team revenue, revenue streams and market size.Front office (10 percent): This is a small weight, both because of the subjective nature of ranking them and because a lot of a front offices abilities are naturally going to be reflected in the current talent, future talent and, at least indirectly, the teams recent revenue. Also, building a team is more than just making a lot of good moves; its also about having a coherent plan and using creativity and flexibility to further those plans.Overall score: We basically rank the categories from 1 (the best) to 30 (worst), then apply our category weights. So a perfect score would be 30 (first in all four categories).Tiebreaker: When two teams ended up with the same overall score, we used the best rank in the Future talent area to determine which team should be ranked higher.No previous rank? Because so much has changed, from the categories to the category weights to even the ranker, weve decided not to compare these to the November rank. However, one thing remains the same between the two sets of rankings ...Cubs retain top spotWhile its not the landslide it was in the November rankings, the Cubs are still numero uno. The objective for all big league front offices is to build the strongest possible organization. Thats exactly what the Cubs have done.Lets start with the major league roster. Even after missing out on the top free-agent pitchers this past offseason and losing their starting left fielder to a season-ending knee injury before the season even began, the Cubs have the strongest case for the best major league talent right now. ZiPS has their current roster with the best true-talent winning percentage in baseball from here on out, at .611, which is the best performance by any roster by ZiPS estimation since the 2011 Yankees. Considering the Cubs have the best winning percentage so far, thats not exactly a computer giving counterintuitive analysis. But believe it or not, theyve actually underperformed their run differential; an argument can be made that theyve played more like a .700 team this year.Whats truly amazing about the Cubs is they have done this all without being an ancient team that sacrificed its future for present gains. Sure, Arodys Vizcaino would look nice in their bullpen right now, as would Zack Godley, but the Cubs built this roster retaining essentially all of their young talent. In fact, all top 10 players from Keith Laws top Cubs prospects heading into 2015 remain in the organization, as do eight of the 10 players on Laws 2014 list (Vizcaino and Arismendy Alcantara are the only ones missing). And thats just the farm system. In the majors are many graduated prospects with long major league careers ahead of them, players like Kris Bryant, Addison Russell, Javier Baez and the injured Kyle Schwarber.Supporting this bevy of current and future talent is an organization that has shown every indication that it will provide ample financial support to maintain its juggernaut status. When the Ricketts purchased the Cubs, many soothsayers predicted gloom and doom, saying they would never invest in the team. Turned out they werent cheap; they were patient. Since the Cubs started to shift aggressively from rebuilding mode to contention after the 2014 season, theyve brought in Jason Heyward, Jon Lester, Ben Zobrist, Miguel Montero, Dexter Fowler?and John Lackey, among others.President of baseball operations Theo Epstein built his reputation dispelling one curse in Boston, and now hes working on lifting the hex from the Cubs. Even as a much bigger name starting his Cubs career than his Red Sox career, Epstein started off not by being flashy, but by patiently taking the long road, ignoring the people who wanted quick fixes, and implementing the rebuilding process that is paying dividends today.Cubs, Cubs, Cubs ... Well be hearing about them aplenty over the next five years.With that, here are the Future Power Rankings:Go to:?1-5 | 6-10 | 11-15 | 16-20 | 21-25 | 26-30?No, they have not won a World Series yet. But yes, the Cubs are the strongest organization in baseball right now. World Series championships are decided every fall based on a few breaks going one way or the other. An organization cannot build around those chances, but what an organization can do is build the best roster possible. Thats what the Cubs have -- the strongest roster in baseball.But what gives the Cubs the top spot here isnt just the roster they have, but the legs their roster has. Players like Kris Bryant and Addison Russell are still at the beginning of their careers, and the team retains an excellent farm system, even if its no longer as deep as that of teams like the Braves or Twins. Add in a willingness to spend money -- the people claiming that the Ricketts family would never spend money have had to eat a hefty helping of crow -- and a front office head (Theo Epstein) who already broke one curse in Boston, and you have the most dangerous team in baseball over the next several years. Whether the Cubs win a championship or not is in the hands of baseballs oft-cruel gods. Outlet Nike Vapormax . - Derek Wolfe says hes finally healthy after suffering a seizure in November that doctors now believe was related to the spinal cord injury he suffered in the preseason. Cheap Vapormax Mens Black . -- Ryan Blaney provided more evidence that Penske Racings No. http://www.vapormaxwholesaleuk.com/wholesale-vapormax-mens-trainers/vapormax-plus-cheap-uk.html .S. Open champion Justin Rose birdied the first hole with a blind shot he hit to a foot of the pin, and he stayed in front Tuesday until he completed a 4-under 67 for a two-shot lead over Jason Dufner in PGA Grand Slam of Golf. Cheap Vapormax Mens White . -- Charline Labonte couldnt have asked for a better homecoming. Cheap Vapormax Womens White . The Cincinnati Reds remain perfect with their speedy rookie outfielder in the starting lineup. Eoin Morgan, Englands limited-overs captain, will not travel to Bangladesh to lead the team in their one-day series due to concerns about security, the ECB has confirmed. Opening batsman Alex Hales has also ruled himself out of the tour for the same reasons.Jos Buttler, the teams vice-captain, will lead in Morgans absence, with squads for the three ODIs and two Tests set to be announced on Friday. Morgan and Hales were foremost among the players to have spoken of their uncertainty about going to Bangladesh, after a terrorist attack in July, and communicated their intentions to Andrew Strauss, Englands director of cricket, at the weekend.Whilst we understand and respect Eoin and Alexs decision, we are disappointed that they have made themselves unavailable for selection for the Bangladesh tour, Strauss said. We have had open and honest conversations with all the players about the security arrangements in Bangladesh and at this stage we are not expecting any other individuals to withdraw from the tour. Final selection for the Bangladesh tour, will now take place on Friday.As with all England overseas tours, the safety and security of players and staff is of the utmost importance to ECB. We will continue to monitor the situation in Bangladesh, take advice and consider the appropriate steps up to and throughout the five weeks we are on tour.Morgan was reported to have told Strauss he would not be going to Bangladesh before the players went for their end-of-season assessments at Loughborough on Friday and Saturday. Those in line for selection were given until this weekend to make a final decision on whether they would accept the recommendation of the ECBs security advisor, Reg Dickason, that the tour should go ahead as planned.Strauss has said he believes it is 100% safe to tour, after a delegation including Dickason, the PCA chief executive, David Leatherdale, and ECB director of cricket operations, John Carr, reported back last month.In a statement on Sunday, the ECB said: A thorough and detailed risk assessment was approved and accepted by the ECB board and the England players and management have been fully briefed on all aspects of the safety and security arrangements.Earlier in the week, Morgan gave details about previous security scares he had experienced on the subcontinent. He referred to a bomb going off in Bangalore while he was playing at the IPL in 2010, as well as political unrest in Bangladesh in 2013.dddddddddddd Last year, Australia cancelled a tour of Bangladesh on government advice and did not send a team to the Under-19 World Cup.I have been to places before when things have become a distraction and once or twice when that has been security, and when it has been I told myself I would not put myself in that situation again, Morgan said. Playing international cricket - or any cricket - is not about worrying about different things, it should be the best time of your life, it should be something that you are looking forward to and wanting to do well in and are able to focus on.While the ECB made clear that the decision whether to tour would be down individuals and no player would be penalised for pulling out, Strauss had been hopeful that Morgan would join Alastair Cook, the Test captain, in committing himself to the tour.Would I like both our captains to be on that tour? Absolutely, definitely, Strauss said on Wednesday. The captain has certain roles and responsibilities that are greater than just looking after themselves. He obviously has a duty to the team. But theyre still human beings - and I think thats an important point to make. They have their own thoughts, concerns, issues and views on life - and weve got to understand that.With Buttler taking charge for the ODIs in Bangladesh, England may have to make a decision about the captaincy in the longer term, ahead of limited-overs series in India and West Indies scheduled for the start of 2017, followed by the Champions Trophy. Morgan has overseen great success since the 2015 World Cup, with England winning four of their last six ODI series, as well as reaching the final of the 2016 World T20.For Hales, the decision could have immediate ramifications for his international career. While he is a regular in the limited-overs teams, his Test place is far less secure after failing to record a century in 11 matches; opting out of the two Tests against Bangladesh is likely to see Hales omitted for the subsequent India series as well, with Lancashires 19-year-old opener Haseeb Hameed tipped to replace him, although he may have been dropped in any event. ' ' '